Rechercher dans ce blog

Monday, November 30, 2020

Be a capitalist — it's not as bad as you think - Santa Fe New Mexican

stratupnation.blogspot.com

Growing up in a privileged family, I should have learned a few things about money.

Sadly, there was so much shame and secrecy around money that I went out into the world knowing nothing.

No one taught me how to open a bank account, pay a bill or balance a checkbook. My dad was a CEO, and my mom was a certified financial planner, so the irony is palpable.

My story highlights a crucial problem — finance is a foreign language. We send young adults out into the world financially illiterate, and then they fall into terrible predicaments because they’ve never learned the tools for success.

Here are two key terms that will help you master the art of wealth accumulation: capitalist and consumer. The wealth-generating mindset of the capitalist builds wealth. The wealth-destroying attitude of the consumer decimates it.

Before we dig further, please try to disregard any preconceived notions you have about the words “capitalist” and “consumer.” I’m reappropriating them for my purposes.

When I talk about consumers, I am referring to people who spend all their income on stuff.

We all need to buy stuff and are technically consumers with most purchases, but the wealth-destroying consumer works and earns an income, wrongly assuming that everything they earn is available to spend. They give up their hard-earned money for stuff that has no lasting value or declines in value over time.

How much is that new pair of jeans worth after you’ve worn them? Unless you are Mick Jagger, not much.

Most consumer goods, such as clothing, cars and electronics, depreciate over time, meaning they are worth less the longer you own them. The result is that consumers are always broke, in debt and never accumulate wealth.

Life for a consumer can also feel like a treadmill: Work to make money, spend money, work some more, repeat ad nauseam. The consumer treadmill makes corporations and capitalists rich — and consumers broke.

There is nothing wrong with stuff, but it is empirically obvious that just having stuff doesn’t make people happy. My parents struggled to find happiness, and they had lots of stuff.

If you want to get off the treadmill of working to live and living just to work, you’ll need a way out of the consumer trap. For that, you must become a capitalist.

But what is a capitalist?

If a consumer is someone who buys stuff that depreciates over time, a capitalist is someone who works to save and invest, buying as many assets as they can — hopefully, environmentally and socially responsible ones.

Those investments grow and are worth more over time. That new money is reinvested to purchase more assets, which steadily compounds until you are financially independent.

That’s wealth. Wealth isn’t about how big your paycheck is or isn’t; it’s about how you use what money you have to create a lasting pot of cash that you can live off of indefinitely.

And here’s the bonus round: If you avoid unnecessary consumer goods that depreciate and focus on sustainable investments, then you automatically reduce your consumption of disposable goods.

Everything you buy that depreciates will, eventually, depreciate to nothing. Then it needs to be recycled, burned or put in a trash heap. Usually, it just ends in a landfill.

It also takes energy and pollution to produce every consumer good. Our hyperconsumption of disposable goods doesn’t just destroy our wealth — it destroys the planet. On this point, our financial best interest and the Earth’s best interest are perfectly aligned.

To retire comfortably around age 65, you’ll need to save and invest at least five to 10 times your annual income.

For a median household with an income of $57,000, they’ll need around $570,000 in wealth to retire comfortably. That’s a big number. If you are retiring sooner, you’ll need much more.

The great news is that technology makes it amazingly easy to buy sustainable investments. You can get started with just a few bucks in your pocket.

Start small and with diligent effort, your investments will grow. Anyone can do it.

You don’t need to be a CEO to become a capitalist. A teacher, a janitor and even a monk can do it.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 12:00PM
https://ift.tt/2JxziiA

Be a capitalist — it's not as bad as you think - Santa Fe New Mexican
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

3 Payment Options For Your Startup Worth Considering - Forbes

stratupnation.blogspot.com

Digital businesses and e-commerce are having a moment. While there has been a long-term trend away from brick-and-mortar businesses, the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic has put this shift into overdrive as consumers look for more convenience, safety, and flexibility in the way they shop.

According to one report, the pandemic has accelerated the shift toward e-commerce by five years, and the consensus is that the changes will be permanent. For businesses large or small, this means re-evaluating future plans to favor digital offerings.

Part of this retooling is to offer payment options that cater to your users and help drive transactions. These days, consumers have countless payment options available to them, and they'll avoid businesses that don't let them have it their way. Offering a standard credit card check out may be holding you back.

You likey don’t need a primer on payment processors like PayPal, Square, or Apple Pay. However, there are other options to consider, many of which can save you costs and drive more sales. Here are three of the best to consider:

1. Consumer finance options

One of the ways that big e-commerce businesses like Amazon keep customers locked into their ecosystem is by offering financing options that spread out the cost of large purchases. Big companies have the financial flexibility to wait for a customer to pay down a balance without worrying about cash flow.

However, startups can now offer similar financing options by partnering with companies like Affirm or QuadPay, meaning even the smallest retailers can give customers the ability to make a purchase and pay it off over time. 

Moreover, the costs for offering this payment option is similar to typical credit card processing fees. Customers gain access to a credit line with an interest rate that's typically in line with what an average credit card offers.

This translates into bigger, more frequent purchases, and the money arrives in your account within two days on average.

2. Digital currency payment options

A few years back, businesses were scrambling to accept cryptocurrencies as payment for goods and services. After the initial rush many companies deprioritized supporting digital currencies. Today, only around 36% of small and medium sized businesses in the US currently accept cryptocurrencies as payment. 

However, new innovations provide better, easier and more cost effective ways to accept crypto payments than ever before. Companies like TrustSwap offer simple, API-based solutions that are inexpensive and support a variety of cryptocurrencies. 

For that reason, it may be time for businesses to reconsider accepting cryptocurrencies as a form of payment, especially as they become more commonplace.

3. International payment options

One of the big benefits of e-commerce is that it allows businesses to access markets that they otherwise couldn't reach. But to do that, it's necessary to accept payments in a variety of currencies. While many businesses turn to well-known companies like PayPal to handle such transactions, they're not always the best option, particularly for small startups.

In many cases, low-volume merchants can get a better deal from less well-known processing platforms without sacrificing any flexibility for their customers. Companies like Skrill allow businesses to accept payment in over 40 different currencies, often at lower rates than PayPal. 

For even greater international flexibility, companies like Payoneer offer businesses the ability to have country-specific bank accounts to accept payments in those markets. This not only simplifies international sales tracking, but it also helps manage tax liabilities and other location-specific merchant issues.

On the cutting edge

There's no right or wrong set of digital payment options. Because there are so many options now available to choose from, startups should mix and match to find the right set of offerings for their specific markets. They may even find ways to access markets that the competition isn't paying attention to. 

Ultimately, you should do what’s best for your customers. If they want to pay in their local currency, give them that option. If they want to pay in installments, you can now easily offer that service. If they prefer digital currencies, you can easily support that too.

By focusing on the consumer and their payment preferences, not only do you create a positive buying experience, you’ll increase conversions and payments. In a competitive marketplace, every dollar, no matter the type or currency, counts.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"Startup" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 03:32AM
https://ift.tt/2HU85q7

3 Payment Options For Your Startup Worth Considering - Forbes
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Facebook to acquire startup Kustomer as it faces antitrust glare - Silicon Valley - Silicon Valley Business Journal

stratupnation.blogspot.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Facebook to acquire startup Kustomer as it faces antitrust glare - Silicon Valley  Silicon Valley Business Journal

"Startup" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 09:29AM
https://ift.tt/3mtSOLu

Facebook to acquire startup Kustomer as it faces antitrust glare - Silicon Valley - Silicon Valley Business Journal
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Democrats Didn’t Have As Bad an Election As You Might Think - New York Magazine

stratupnation.blogspot.com
Despite perceptions that Pelosi’s House Democrats “lost” while Biden “won,” it was really for the most part a straight-ticket election. Photo: Getty Images

Sometimes it’s easy to get tangled up in the terminology of winning and losing in elections. Joe Biden clearly won the presidency, albeit by smaller margins than most observers expected. But unless Democrats sweep the two January runoffs in Georgia, they will have lost the battle for control of the Senate. And Democrats definitely lost at least ten net House seats. That said, Democrats did maintain control of the House, and, for that matter, posted a net gain of at least one Senate seat.

Still, the perception that Biden won but the party “lost” might have created an exaggerated impression that ticket splitting made a big comeback in 2020. Yes, there are a few clear examples of Republicans doing well in places where Trump didn’t do quite so well. Senator Susan Collins ran seven points ahead of the president in Maine. There were a smattering of suburban House Republican congressional candidates, notably in California and Texas, who appear to have overcome Trump’s losses in their district to post wins. But let’s not overthink this and engage in grand narratives of this or that “wing” of the party damaging their caucus in the House or of Republicans shrewdly distancing themselves from Trump (most didn’t) and/or convincing swing voters they would serve as a counterweight to President Biden.

For the most part, this was a straight-ticket election in which the results tracked as what you would expect from a competitive presidential contest. Biden’s lead over Trump in the national popular vote currently stands at 4 percent. Collins was the only Senate candidate to win a state lost by her party’s presidential nominee (again, pending the Georgia runoffs). And the national House popular vote gave Democrats 50.5 percent and Republicans 48.1 percent, which is actually quite close to the presidential breakdown of 51.1 percent for Biden and 47.1 percent for Trump. The Atlantic’s Ron Brownstein estimates that Biden won 223 House districts (compared to 209 for Obama in 2012 and 205 for Clinton in 2016). This year, Democrats won 222 House seats with three races still undecided. It’s all fairly cut-and-dried, at least from a national perspective.

It’s true, as Brownstein reminds us, that House Democrats suffer from a less efficient distribution of voters than Republicans, which keeps their share of districts from perfectly representing the national popular vote.

“If you apportion the House in a fair drawing, it favors Republicans, because Democrats live in these urban enclaves that are 80 percent [Democratic] and they waste a lot of votes,” Tom Davis, a former Republican representative from Northern Virginia who chaired the National Republican Congressional Committee, told me.

But again, it’s possible to exaggerate the importance of structural issues. 50.5 percent of 435 House seats is 220. Democrats aren’t really punching below their weight.

The bottom line is that this country is still divided almost evenly between two increasingly polarized major parties. All the insane events of 2020, underlaid by Trump’s uniquely divisive presidency and a culture war that rages on and on, didn’t change that. A lot of unexpected things happened on the margins, but for the most part this election was a reversion to the mean after a fairly standard midterm reaction to the party controlling the White House. Certainly, there are very important consequences that will flow from small variations to the general pattern of partisan voting, particularly in the closely divided Senate. And without question, Democrats will pay a large cost for failing to win big across the board, particularly when redistricting arrives next year and Republican control of all those state legislative chambers that was at risk this year gives the GOP an advantage in drawing new districts for the next decade. Overall, though, the partisan and ideological gridlock that sometimes feels like the 21st century’s natural state remains firmly intact.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 06:13AM
https://ift.tt/39rFQdG

Democrats Didn’t Have As Bad an Election As You Might Think - New York Magazine
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

How bad is the coronavirus pandemic about to get? Thanksgiving travel numbers look grim - OregonLive

stratupnation.blogspot.com

Coronavirus infections are already reaching unprecedented levels throughout the U.S. Now with Thanksgiving in the rearview mirror and Christmas and New Year’s just around the curve, the question is: Just how much worse is the pandemic going to get?

The latest travel data out Monday suggest that things are looking grim. Between 800,000 and 1.1 million people flew in the days leading up to and after the holiday, according to data released by the Transportation Safety Administration. Though those numbers are a fraction of typical Thanksgiving travel patterns, they are far higher than public health officials and epidemiologists hoped to see.

Deborah Birx, the White House coronavirus response coordinator, said that Americans who traveled this past week should “assume that you were exposed and you became infected.” She urged those that traveled to get tested within the next week.

The number of new COVID-19 cases in the U.S. topped 200,000 for the first time Friday. There have been more than 265,000 deaths. Last Wednesday, as millions had already begun their holiday travel, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention forecast as many as 21,400 new deaths due to the virus over the next four weeks.

Ashish Jha, dean of Brown University’s School of Public Health, said he suspects those numbers are not high enough.

“Every time I look at the data, it’s worse,” he said.

Jha says he expects the number of new deaths to be more in the range of 25,000 to 30,000 in the Thanksgiving aftermath.

“Things are going to be so bad over the next month,” Jha said.

Exactly how bad it will get is difficult to say. Americans not only flew, but also drove to Thanksgiving celebrations. Before the holiday, the American Automobile Association predicted significant declines in bus, train and cruise travel, but only a slight drop in car travel. AAA said it would not have travel figures for the holiday anytime soon.

Car travel was projected to fall 4.3% from last year’s pre-pandemic level, to 47.8 million travelers. With less travel this year by public transportation, AAA estimates driving will account for 95% of all holiday travel. On Monday, AAA said travel may have been less than initially forecast because of climbing infection rates and public health warnings. U.S. gasoline demand decreased 7.3% in seven days ending Nov. 28, according to GasBuddy, the travel and navigation app.

Even with a surge in online sales, some Americans still hit the road to shop. Chains with lines out the door included Lululemon Athletica Inc., Bath & Body Works and Urban Outfitters. Shoppers camped overnight in some locations of GameStop Corp., one of the few retailers to do brick-and-mortar releases of new video game consoles.

“This does have the potential to turn into another superspreader event,” Doug Stephens, founder of consulting firm Retail Prophet, said of the shopping weekend.

The Trump administration had been sending out widely varying guidance on holiday travel in the weeks leading up to Thanksgiving, and only in the final week did the CDC overtly urge people to stay home. Many health policy experts say that was too little guidance, too late.

In Canada, which celebrated Thanksgiving on Oct. 11, the average number of cases diagnosed each day more than doubled after the holiday, growing from 2,000 cases per day in mid-October to an average of 4,776 cases daily in the past week.

In the U.S., cases have risen after previous other holidays since the pandemic began.

“That does not bode well,” said Caitlin Rivers, a professor at Johns Hopkins University who researches public health preparedness. “The winter holidays will just accelerate the winter trends we have already seen.”

The CDC’s forecast is an ensemble model that combines projections from 36 separate groups. Those forecasts range from 10,600 to 21,400 new deaths by Dec. 19. But the numbers of deaths often lag by several weeks.

One group, the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, publishes projections for further afield. It forecasts the number of deaths continuing to grow, reaching more than 470,000 by March 1. Projections that far out are subject to revision. Still, that’s almost double the number of Americans the pandemic have killed so far.

Hospitals in many regions of the country, including the hard-hit Upper Midwest, are already near or beyond capacity. Anticipating a further surge, many have begun prepping tents and other temporary spaces to handle an influx of cases. Reports of doctors and nurses retiring early due to the pandemic are another worrisome signal. Even as equipment shortages have eased, some areas around the country now face a shortage of specialists who know how to operate vital equipment, such as breathing machines.

“Before the holiday we were already crowded in the hospital,” said Janis Orlowski, chief healthcare officer for the American Association of Medical Colleges. There are already as many as 90,000 people hospitalized due to the virus, she said, and that number is expected to climb past 100,000. That’s almost twice as many as there were on Nov. 1. “We don’t know how big of a bump we’re going to get, but we’re bracing for a big bump,” she said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 04:52AM
https://ift.tt/2Vk6flx

How bad is the coronavirus pandemic about to get? Thanksgiving travel numbers look grim - OregonLive
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

This Startup Lets Renters Begin Earning Equity In Their Homes Immediately - Forbes

stratupnation.blogspot.com

For many Americans, buying a first home is simply not economically feasible. So they end up paying a significant portion of their salary in rent, which, in fact, accounts for about 45% of Millennials’ income, according to recent research.

That’s the problem Up&Up seeks to address. Basically, the two-year-old company gives renters a way to get an ownership stake in their homes while they’re living there.

Thus, instead of paying two months rent for a security deposit, that money goes into the property as an initial investment and they keep on building up equity after that.

“Over time, we imagine people will think it was archaic that consumers had to lock up a large part of their net worth in a security deposit and put the majority of their income towards a wealth depreciating asset,” says Basil Siddiqui, a co-founder of the New York City-based company.

Earning a Stake

How does it work? Renters choose from a list of hundreds of properties which would otherwise only be available for purchase. Then they pay a deposit for a two-year lease that becomes their first ownership stake, thereby beginning to earn them equity immediately. (It typically comes to a 1% to 2% share).

After that, every month, that share of the property increases as they pay their rent. In addition, if the house appreciates in value during the course of the lease, then the renter earns more. And should renters want to do so, they can convert their ownership stake into a down payment to buy either the home they’re living in or another Up&Up property. At the end of the lease, they have the option of cashing out completely.

 Renters must have a credit score of 680 or more and earn at least three times the rent in monthly income. If they don’t meet those criteria, they can apply with an appropriate co-signer.

An East Village Condo

It all started about ten years ago when co-founder Michael Wong and two friends invested in a condo in New York City’s East Village with the intention of renting it out. Then, one of those pals decided he wanted to live there. So the group came up with an arrangement: He would pay 1/3 the mortgage and maintenance and 2/3 of market rent.

Over the next few years, that experience led to the idea for a real estate business aimed at helping renters, especially those in their 20’s, earn an ownership stake in the houses they lived in. “We’re allowing them to partake of the upside of owning property,” says Wong.

The first concept was to form what Siddiqui calls a “co-buying company”, meaning that if a buyer had, say, 20% of the down payment, the company would cover the other 80%, thereby making the purchaser a 20% owner. But the founders realized that most of their target customers had less than $1,000 in their savings account and were spending much of their income on rent, making it difficult to save for a down payment.

So they decided to focus on working with renters, with a different plan. “Our customers get to access the benefits of ownership a decade before they would otherwise regardless if they buy a home or not,” says Siddiqui.  “They invest upfront and over time.” Revenues come from fees that the company’s investors pay for property and asset management.

Most of the properties are in St. Louis. That’s because research revealed homes there had the most stable prices of 25 cities and seemed to pose the least risk to investors. In August, the company started adding properties in Atlanta.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"Startup" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 02:08AM
https://ift.tt/3obvfaY

This Startup Lets Renters Begin Earning Equity In Their Homes Immediately - Forbes
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

4 reasons why empty malls on Black Friday aren't a bad omen for the holiday shopping season - CNBC

stratupnation.blogspot.com
People walk through the King of Prussia mall, on Black Friday, in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
Sarah Silbiger | Reuters

Instead of rushing to malls, Black Friday shoppers largely headed to retailers' websites this year.

The deal-heavy holiday came in the middle of a sales season that began in October and will stretch beyond Christmas. Black Friday did not play its typical role of starting the holiday shopping frenzy, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic.

The health crisis has upended the cadence of holiday shopping, making it difficult to gauge how successful the season will be for retailers based on the size of Black Friday crowds. Shoppers have been checking off their gift lists since October. That led to a drop in demand over the holiday weekend.

Consumer spending fell 22.4% year over year during the period from Thanksgiving to Sunday, according to GlobalData, which uses consumer panels and data from retailers, mall owners and brands to forecast sales. Yet the numbers look much better when the broader timeframe is considered. Spending prior to the Black Friday weekend rose by 65.7% year over year.

Retailers and investors aren't sure how much consumers will continue to shop in the weeks ahead — or if they have already checked off most items on their list. Other factors, including the higher costs of shipping and lower levels of discounting also will be at play.

Sonia Lapinsky, a managing director in the retail practice of AlixPartners, said one of the big questions is whether the online sales surge can offset the steep drop in store traffic.

She said retailers have a challenging sales season ahead. As they pack and ship more holiday purchases, higher costs are cutting into profits. Mall-based stores, hammered by temporary sales closures early in the pandemic, have to dig out of a deep hole. As customers shop weeks of sales from the comfort of their couch, they may be more deliberate about purchases and less likely to snap up extra items or go on a panic-induced shopping spree.

AlixPartners forecast an increase of 1% to 2.6% in holiday sales in October, November and December, compared with the three-month period last year. But at the end of the day, Lapinsky said retailers will likely make less money.

"All of the new ways of shopping are really eating into profitability," she said.

Here are some takeaways from Black Friday 2020, and what it may tell us about holiday shoppers' habits, retailers' bottom lines, and the state of the industry:

Empty malls, busy websites

Black Friday has traditionally been associated with busy malls. Not this year. The event drove clicks to websites, rather than footsteps at shopping malls. Spending online soared nearly 22% to $9 billion, according to Adobe Analytics. The company analyzes website transactions from 80 of the top 100 U.S. online retailers.

U.S. consumers spent an average of $27.50 per person, or roughly $6.3 million per minute, shopping online on Black Friday, Adobe found.

It was the second largest online spending day in the history of the U.S., after last year's Cyber Monday, Adobe said. And the firm expects Cyber Monday 2020 to become the biggest online sales day in history, with spending between $10.8 billion and $12.7 billion. That'd translate to growth of 15% to 35% compared with last year.

GlobalData estimates total spending on Black Friday rose to $62.45 billion, an increase of 2.1% over 2019. Online spending made up $16.99 billion of that, a 48.3% increase year over year. Black Friday spending at stores was $45.46 billion, a decline of 8.6% year over year.

The number of shoppers at malls cratered 52.1% on Black Friday compared with last year, according to preliminary data from Sensormatic Solutions, a retail tracking firm. Overall, for the six key weeks of the holiday season this year, traffic in retail stores is expected to be down 22% to 25% year over year, the firm estimates.

A note from KeyBanc Capital Markets said the number of shoppers at stores was the least it's observed on Black Friday in more than 15 years.

"In fact, select stores we visited seemed even emptier than a pre-Covid-19 weekday," KeyBanc analyst Ed Yruma said. "Santa stayed away from stores."

Strong categories had pricing power

Shoppers used the day to stock up on lotions and perfumes, comfortable clothing and kitchen appliances like air fryers and coffee makers, either to gift to others or to keep to themselves.

The top categories and products largely fit into stay-at-home trends that retailers have seen throughout the pandemic, as people dress in athleisure while working remotely, cook more instead of dining out, and treat themselves to indulgences from candles to home spa products.

Activewear and outdoor retailers, such as Yeti and Ugg, resisted heavy promotions, Jefferies found, but their products still wound up in many shoppers' virtual baskets. Like the early months of the pandemic, slippers, sweats and camping gear have remained popular as people keep their attire cozy and casual and seek out safe ways to socialize, such as hiking with family and friends.

The winners on Black Friday 2020 included L Brands' Bath & Body Works, Dick's Sporting Goods, Lululemon and Williams Sonoma, according to a research note by Dana Telsey, the CEO and chief research officer of the Telsey Advisory Group.

Among the toys, Hot Wheels and Lego sets were the break-out hits and among electronics, Apple AirPods, Apple Watches, Amazon Echo and Samsung TVs topped the list, according to Adobe.

There were some breakout hits, too — like a jump in sales of chess sets, thanks to Netflix's hit show "The Queen's Gambit."

But just how much of these stay-at-home items will consumers still be buying in 2021? That's something retailers will have to gauge next.

Curbside options drove sales

Despite stores being emptier, curbside pickup paid off for some retailers, as it attracted customers and lowered shipping costs. Curbside and in-store pickup — sometimes called "buy online pickup in store" — increased 52% on Black Friday year over year, according to Adobe Analytics.

For some shoppers, that option became the selling point, according to Adobe. On Thanksgiving Day, for example, retailers that offered curbside pickup benefited from a 31% higher conversion rate of traffic to their websites.

Companies from Best Buy to Bed Bath & Beyond to Home Depot have added curbside pickup during the pandemic to make it easy for shoppers to get purchases without stepping inside of the store. For shoppers, the option is a safe and quick alternative to browsing store aisles and standing in a checkout line. For retailers, the option is a cheaper alternative to fulfilling online orders without the cost of delivering an item to a person's door.

Analysts and retailers expect that option to get even more popular in the weeks ahead, as last-minute shoppers worry about shipping delays or look to avoid high shipping fees.

Fewer markdowns

Shoppers who hit the malls or websites found deals — but the discounts weren't as deep or as dramatic as some may have anticipated. The majority of retailers kept their promotions on par with last year rather than slashing them more to inspire purchases, according to research by Jefferies. Of the approximately 50 retailers that the firm tracked, it found that 54% of their sales promotions were flat year over year and 22% were down from last year. Only 24% featured higher year-over-year promotions.

That was due, in large part, to retailers keeping a tighter check on inventories throughout the pandemic. It wasn't the case early on. In March and April, companies were faced with piles of merchandise that consumers weren't buying and had heavy markdowns in the summer.

They canceled and cut back on future orders, so they wouldn't risk a similar situation during the holidays.

Telsey said that in the branded apparel space, "promotions were unsurprisingly muted or nonexistent on Black Friday."

The true test might come in 2021, though, when retailers are faced with placing more orders, gauging consumer demand and strategizing on setting prices for the New Year.

"We do expect the increasingly important question will begin to focus on what happens next year," BMO Capital Markets analyst Simeon Siegel said in a research note. "Who maintains the discipline and learnings that less revenue can drive higher profits, versus who succumbs to the temptation of the incremental sale."

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 03:35AM
https://ift.tt/3muQBQg

4 reasons why empty malls on Black Friday aren't a bad omen for the holiday shopping season - CNBC
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Ohio State startup helps focus attention on government-sponsored research - The Ohio State University News

stratupnation.blogspot.com

A startup spun out of technology from The Ohio State University will be recognized next month in an event highlighting the role of federally funded research.

IR Medtek is one of 22 university-affiliated startup companies from across the nation to participate in the University Innovation and Entrepreneurship Showcase sponsored by the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities and the Association of American Universities. The showcase highlights the important role of federally funded university research in supporting entrepreneurship and innovation in the U.S. economy. Due to COVID-19, the event will feature a social media campaign instead of a presentation at the Capitol.

IR Medtek LLC was founded in early 2019 in collaboration with the Ohio State Innovation Fund. The company has licensed technology developed at Ohio State, including the James Cancer Hospital, for the early, non-invasive diagnosis of skin and other cancers.

“Cancer is important to almost everybody – everyone knows somebody who has cancer. There are millions of cases of skin cancer detected each year. It’s becoming an increasingly important problem in the United States,” said James Coe, professor of chemistry and biochemistry at Ohio State.

Coe, the chief technology officer at IR Medtek, described the innovation as a fast infrared cancer probe that can aid in determining whether or not an abnormality is cancerous and needs to be investigated more thoroughly.

One of the researchers who developed the infrared probe, Coe said the project would not have progressed without the support of federally funded research.

“Without an NIH grant, I would have never worked on cancer research. I’m a physical chemist. I teach quantum mechanics,” he said. “I learned through that NIH grant that you could take infrared spectrum of tissues and tell whether they had cancer or not. So I would have never worked on the project in the first place without federal funding.”

IR Medtek CEO Doug Cohen said government-sponsored research helps “de-risk” the technology.

“Prior to federal funding, this was just an idea and a concept,” Cohen said. “There was not something that you would have started a company on. It has to advance to a point where somebody like us can come in and say, ‘Okay, this has gotten far enough along that we can consider creating a company.’”

Federal funding wasn’t the only source of support. Coe said the infrared technology was supported by the Ohio State’s Accelerator Awards program, which helps advance successful technologies to the point where they are ready to be licensed to a startup company. The program is funded by the Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation and Start-up Fund (TVSF) and administered through Ohio State’s Keenan Center for Entrepreneurship. The company is currently conducting further research on the infrared technology.

“We are conducting the first phase of two feasibility studies to really prove out the technology, that it will work specifically in the commercialization path that we’re on,” Cohen said. “We are about halfway through the first study and the results have been very positive.”

Upon validation of the technology in a clinical context, IR Medtek intends to proceed with commercialization of the technology.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"Startup" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 05:00AM
https://ift.tt/39tGuHr

Ohio State startup helps focus attention on government-sponsored research - The Ohio State University News
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Song You Need to Know: Bad Boy Chiller Crew, ‘Needed You’ - Rolling Stone

stratupnation.blogspot.com

Bad Boy Chiller Crew hail from a northern English city, Bradford, that few people outside the region often think about, and they specialize in a kind of music, bassline, that hasn’t been popular since the mid-2000s — and yet embracing both these things has made BBCC one of the most exciting and intriguing acts to emerge in U.K. rap this year. After releasing their first proper mixtape, Full Wack No Brakes, in September (its predecessor, Git Up Mush, was only available at local vape shops and corner stores), the group is back with a new song, “Needed You,” that rattles with their raucous energy and captures their big pop ambitions.

A bit of context: Bad Boy Chiller Crew is Kane, GK, and Clive, three friends who first gained local recognition for their Jackass-style comedy videos, then parlayed that into an even more successful music venture. The crux of their sound is bassline — a harder, faster offshoot of U.K. garage — that was born in northern England, spawned a few 2000s hits (T2’s “Heartbroken,” H “Two” O’s “What’s It Gonna Be”), but otherwise receded from the pop consciousness while continuing to live on in places like Bradford.

While early bassline typically featured pop or R&B vocals, Bad Boy Chiller Crew rap over these ridiculously quick beats. Full Wack No Brakes is a delightfully delirious barrage of big beats and big bars about fast cars, loud parties, ditching the cops, and all the other nonsense that’s part of the “charva” lifestyle. “Charva,” which comes from the insulting slang term “chav,” isn’t exactly a term of endearment — it’s usually a slight aimed at brash, boisterous boys, injected with a healthy dose of British classism — but BBCC embrace it with a wink. “It’s like you are one of the boys but you’re also a toerag!” Clive told The Guardian in July.

Listening to BBCC, or watching the music videos for breakout tracks like “Guns Up” and “450” (which features fellow Bradford MC and auxiliary member S Dog), it’s hard not to wonder if it’s all a big joke. On the surface, the group recalls Kurupt FM, the bumbling pirate radio/grime crew from the acclaimed BBC mockumentary series People Just Do Nothing. But Kane, GK, and Clive aren’t actors playing characters. They’re real-life characters, playing up reality, like so many of the best pop stars.

“Needed You,” BBCC’s new song, is less a bassline banger than a classic garage song, but despite the drop in BPM, it contains all the elements that make Bad Boy Chiller Crew so irresistible. Slick production, a video packed with nonsense (like trying to pull a scooter out of a roadside ditch) and cheeky punch lines — from Clive’s “Young buck, mullet haircut/Pull up to the club, tell her fill up my cup,” to GK’s “White Ace, cider cigs were a fiver/Mark ‘Ruff’ Ryder, stung the bus driver.” But it’s Kane, the group’s de facto leader, who steals the show again: For an MC who strikes such an unassuming pose, he wields a unique command over the mic, switching flows on a dime and spilling garrulous verses without missing a beat. Over-the-top as it may be, it’s hard not to believe him when he spits, “Now won’t stop ’til I’m A-list famous/Home-grown weed in blue slim papers/No flavors, police try raid us/Pots in the attic ’til I cop me a Patek/Or pull up on that brother in a big 4Matic.”

Find a playlist of all of our recent Songs You Need to Know selections on Spotify.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
December 01, 2020 at 12:14AM
https://ift.tt/3los3Hc

Song You Need to Know: Bad Boy Chiller Crew, ‘Needed You’ - Rolling Stone
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Why spending a long time on your phone isn't bad for mental health - Science Daily

stratupnation.blogspot.com

General smartphone usage is a poor predictor of anxiety, depression or stress say researchers, who advise caution when it comes to digital detoxes.

The study published in Technology, Mind, and Behavior was led by Heather Shaw and Kristoffer Geyer from Lancaster University with Dr David Ellis and Dr Brittany Davidson from the University of Bath and Dr Fenja Ziegler and Alice Smith from the University of Lincoln.

They measured the time spent on smartphones by 199 iPhone users and 46 Android users for one week. Participants were also asked about their mental and physical health, completing clinical scales that measure anxiety and depression symptoms. They also completed a scale which measured how problematic they perceived their smartphone usage to be.

Surprisingly, the amount of time spent on the smartphone was not related to poor mental health.

Lead author Heather Shaw of Lancaster University's Department of Psychology said: "A person's daily smartphone pickups or screen time did not predict anxiety, depression, or stress symptoms. Additionally, those who exceeded clinical 'cut off points' for both general anxiety and major depressive disorder did not use their phone more than those who scored below this threshold."

Instead, the study found that mental health was associated with concerns and worries felt by participants about their own smartphone usage.

This was measured through their scores on a problematic usage scale where they were asked to rate statements such as "Using my smartphone longer than I had intended," and "Having tried time and again to shorten my smartphone use time but failing all the time."

Heather Shaw said: "It is important to consider actual device use separately from people's concerns and worries about technology. This is because the former doesn't show noteworthy relationships with mental health, whereby the latter does."

Previous studies have focussed on the potentially detrimental impact of 'screen time', but the study shows that people's attitudes or worries are likely to drive these findings.

Dr David Ellis, from the University of Bath's School of Management, said: "Mobile technologies have become even more essential for work and day-to-day life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results add to a growing body of research that suggests reducing general screen time will not make people happier. Instead of pushing the benefits of digital detox, our research suggests people would benefit from measures to address the worries and fears that have grown up around time spent using phones."

Story Source:

Materials provided by Lancaster University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 11:51PM
https://ift.tt/37nEZrI

Why spending a long time on your phone isn't bad for mental health - Science Daily
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Right time, right place: Des Moines entrepreneur's remote internet health device startup booms in pandemic - desmoinesregister.com

Facebook Nears Purchase of Startup Valued at $1 Billion - The Wall Street Journal

ServiceNow is acquiring Element AI, the Canadian startup building AI services for enterprises - TechCrunch

stratupnation.blogspot.com

ServiceNow, the cloud-based IT services company, is making a significant acquisition today to fill out its longer-term strategy to be a big player in the worlds of automation and artificial intelligence for enterprises. It is acquiring Element AI, a startup out of Canada.

Founded by AI pioneers and backed by some of the world’s biggest AI companies — it raised hundreds of millions of dollars from the likes of Microsoft, Intel, Nvidia and Tencent, among others — Element AI’s aim was to build and provision AI-based IT services for enterprises, in many cases organizations that are not technology companies by nature.

Terms of the deal are not being disclosed, a spokesperson told TechCrunch, but we now have multiple sources telling us the price was around $500 million. For some context, Element AI was valued at between $600 million and $700 million when it last raised money, $151 million (or C$200 million at the time) in September 2019.

Even at $500 million, this deal would be ServiceNow’s biggest acquisition, although it would be a sizeable devaluation compared to the startup’s last price at fundraising.

A spokesperson confirmed that ServiceNow is making a full acquisition and will retain most of Element AI’s technical talent, including AI scientists and practitioners, but that it will be winding down its existing business after integrating what it wants and needs.

“Our focus with this acquisition is to gain technical talent and AI capabilities,” the spokesperson said. That will also include Element AI co-founder and CEO, JF GagnĂ©, joining ServiceNow, and co-founder Dr. Yoshua Bengio taking on a role as technical advisor.

Those who are not part of those teams will be supported with severance or assistance in looking for other jobs within ServiceNow. A source estimated to us that this could affect around half of the organization.

The startup is headquartered in Montreal, and ServiceNow’s plan is to create an AI Innovation Hub based around that “to accelerate customer-focused AI innovation in the Now Platform.” (That is the brand name of its automation services.)

Last but not least, ServiceNow will start re-platforming some of Element AI’s capabilities, she said. “We expect to wind down most of Element AI’s customers after the deal is closed.”

The deal is the latest move for a company aiming to build a modern platform fit for our times.

ServiceNow, under CEO Bill McDermott (who joined in October 2019 from SAP), has been on a big investment spree in the name of bringing more AI and automation chops to the SaaS company. That has included a number of acquisitions this year, including Sweagle, Passage AI, and Loom (respectively for $25 million, $33 million and $58 million), plus regular updates to its larger workflow automation platform.

ServiceNow has been around since 2004, so it’s not strictly a legacy business, but all the same the publicly-traded company, with a current market cap of nearly $103 billion, is vying to position itself as the go-to company for “digital transformation” — the buzz term for enterprise IT services this year, as everyone scrambles to do more online, in the cloud, and remotely to continue operating through a global health pandemic and whatever comes in its wake.

“Technology is no longer supporting the business, technology is the business,” McDermott said earlier this year. In a tight market where it is completely plausible that Salesforce might scoop up Slack, ServiceNow is making a play for more tools to cover its own patch of the field.

“AI technology is evolving rapidly as companies race to digitally transform 20th century processes and business models,” said ServiceNow Chief AI Officer Vijay Narayanan, in a statement today. “ServiceNow is leading this once-in-a-generation opportunity to make work, work better for people. With Element AI’s powerful capabilities and world class talent, ServiceNow will empower employees and customers to focus on areas where only humans excel – creative thinking, customer interactions, and unpredictable work. That’s a smarter way to workflow.”

Element AI was always a very ambitious concept for a startup. Dr Yoshua Bengio, winner of the 2018 Turing Award who co-founded the company with AI expert Nicolas Chapados and Jean-François GagnĂ© (Element AI’s CEO) alongside Anne Martel, Jean-Sebastien Cournoyer and Philippe Beaudoin, saw a gap in the market.

Their idea was to build AI services for businesses that were not tech companies in their DNA, but would still very much need to tap into the innovations of the tech world in order to continue growing and remaining competitive with said tech companies as the latter moved deeper into a wider range of industries and the companies themselves required increasing sophistication to operate and grow. They needed, in essence, to disrupt themselves before getting unceremoniously disrupted by someone else.

And on top of that, Element AI could work for and with the tech companies taking strategic investments in Element AI, as those investors wanted to tap some of that expertise themselves, as well as work with the startup to bring more services and win more deals in the enterprise. In addition to its four (sometimes fiercely competitive) investors, other backers included the likes of McKinsey.

Yet what form all of that would take was never completely clear.

When I covered the startup’s most recent tranche of funding last year, I noted that it wasn’t very forthcoming on who its customers actually where. Looking at its website, it still isn’t, although it does lay out several verticals where it aims to work. They include insurance, pharma, logistics, retail, supply chain, manufacturing, government and capital markets.

There were some other positive points. Element AI also played a strong ethics card with its AI For Good efforts, starting with work with Amnesty in 2018 and most recently Mozilla. Indeed, 2018 — a year after Element AI was founded — was also the year AI seemed to hit the mainstream consciousness — and also start to appear somewhat more creepy, with algorithmic misfires, pervasive facial recognition, and more “automated” applications that didn’t work that well and so on — so launching an ethical aim definitely made sense.

But for all of that, it seems that there perhaps were not enough threads there to need a bigger cloth as a standalone business. Glassdoor reviews also speak of an endemic disorganization at the startup, which might not have helped, or was perhaps a sign of bigger issues.

“Element AI’s vision has always been to redefine how companies use AI to help people work smarter,” said Element AI Founder and CEO, Jean-Francois GagnĂ© in a statement. “ServiceNow is leading the workflow revolution and we are inspired by its purpose to make the world of work, work better for people. ServiceNow is the clear partner for us to apply our talent and technology to the most significant challenges facing the enterprise today.”

The acquisition is expected to be completed by early 2021.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"Startup" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 09:47PM
https://ift.tt/2JeH4ym

ServiceNow is acquiring Element AI, the Canadian startup building AI services for enterprises - TechCrunch
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

BAR REPORT - Professionalism in the law: The good, the bad and a hopeful future | New Jersey Law Journal - Law.com

stratupnation.blogspot.com

From friendly banter between legal adversaries during breaks in the courtroom to practicing without bias, professionalism in the law was the subject of discussion for a panel of state and federal judges, lawyers and law school deans who convened for the New Jersey Commission on Professionalism in the Law’s recent 25th anniversary program.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 08:02PM
https://ift.tt/2JqrNKo

BAR REPORT - Professionalism in the law: The good, the bad and a hopeful future | New Jersey Law Journal - Law.com
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

The good, the bad and the ugly from Sunday’s loss to the Saints - 104.3 The Fan

stratupnation.blogspot.com

(Photo by Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)

The Broncos looked awful on Sunday against the Saints. It was already going to be a tough game to win against that ferocious New Orleans defense, and things got incredibly more complicated on Saturday when we learned that Denver would be without all of their quarterbacks in Week 12. The quarterbacks were considered high-risk, close-contacts as they were around backup Jeff Driskel who tested positive for COVID-19 on Thursday.

The offense turned to a variety of players at quarterback – none of them actually being quarterbacks. One player was practice squad wide receiver Kendall Hinton, others like running backs Phillip Lindsay and Royce Freeman took snaps, as well. The result of this non-quarterback rotation at quarterback was disastrous.

Broncos head coach Vic Fangio did not pull any punches when talking about his disappointment in the quarterback room for causing this situation.

“I was disappointed on a couple levels. That our quarterbacks put us in this position and that our quarterbacks put the league in this position. We count on them to be the leaders of the team and leaders of the offense and those guys made a mistake and that is disappointing. Obviously, I haven’t done a good enough job of selling the protocols to them when they are on their own so part of that could fall on me. I thought I was. We have emphasized it a lot and we’re really doing good with COVID up to this point as it relates relative to other teams. There was a failing there and that’s disappointing,” Fangio said.

How does the team bounce back from this embarrassing loss? Up next, a trip to Arrowhead Stadium to take on the world champion Kansas City Chiefs. Before we get too far ahead of ourselves, let’s take a look back at the good, the bad and the ugly from the Week 12 loss.

***

The Good

There is little good to take away from this game. Nothing good came from the Broncos offense today, so any “good” has to come from the defensive side of the ball. Once again, the Broncos rush defense gave up more than 200 yards on the ground to a team – which is understandable because of the players/starters they’re missing on the line and the insane amount of time they were on the field because of the offensive woes.

I have liked the play of rookie cornerback Essang Bassey, and he came down with the first interception of his career against the Saints. After A.J. Bouye tipped a Taysom Hill pass, Bassey moved underneath the ball and snared the pick. He had a knack for being around the ball in college at Wake Forest, and Bassey had more pass breakups (35) over the last two years of his college career than any other defensive back in the FBS.

That nose for the ball and work ethic have garnered Bassey more playing time in recent weeks. He’s been working hard ever since training camp when he wanted to prove himself as a player who could make the 53-man roster coming from the 2020 college free agents available after the draft.

“Every day and every practice, every game, I’m just trying to get better and I feel like I have been since I first stepped into the lineup and since I first started playing. Every day I try and keep getting better and better. I was able to make a play today, hopefully I can make more in the future and that’s going to, like I said, come from me continuing to learn and grow and continue getting better,” Bassey said.

***

The Bad

I’m only going to pick one “bad” thing from Sunday’s contest. Actually, it’s technically two “bad” observations from the Broncos game – the injuries to starting cornerback Bryce Callahan and co-starting running back Phillip Lindsay.

Callahan has only missed one game this year, a good thing for a player who has never played a full 16-game season during his pro career. He’s the best cornerback on the roster, and the Broncos defense isn’t as good if Callahan is not out there. Callahan is arguably the best slot corner in the league, but he can also excel on the outside as well. If this foot problem causes him to miss more time, the Broncos defense will not be as good.

Lindsay is the best running back on the roster yet usually doesn’t get as much work as he should get. He opened the game as the quarterback and ran the wildcat with co-starter Melvin Gordon in the backfield next to him. Like Callahan, Lindsay has missed time this year as well due to injury. A knee injury can be tricky to deal with if it’s minor. Lindsay might have to miss more time and the offense will then miss one of its most-explosive players.

Fangio did not provide much of an update after the game and hopefully the injuries aren’t serious. We’ll have to wait until later in the week to know more.

“Bryce’s foot started bothering him and Phillip tweaked his knee a little bit. That’s all I know at this point,” Fangio said.

***

The Ugly

I do not blame Hinton for this loss. He was thrust into a no-win situation and tried to make the most of it. A former prep and college quarterback, Hinton played wide receiver over his final two college seasons at Wake Forest. He didn’t throw the ball that much in college and was around a 50 percent passer with a few more touchdowns than interceptions.

When the Broncos picked Hinton up as an undrafted wide receiver earlier this year, I applauded the move. I liked Hinton’s game from an athletic standpoint, but what really stood out to me was his high football intelligence. Hinton is a smart player who obviously understands concepts and can read defenses.

That being said, it was an ugly performance against the Saints. Hinton only completed 1-of-9 passes for 13 yards and had two interceptions with two other passes that should have been intercepted. He’s dreamed of playing quarterback at the highest level but not like this.

“I would not say this is how I planned it out in my dreams, but it usually doesn’t work out how you want it. So, just getting this opportunity and this experience has been amazing. Imagining myself playing quarterback in the NFL four years ago, it’s completely different being in a completely different situation. But, it’s an experience like none,” Hinton said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 08:52PM
https://ift.tt/39rPc9f

The good, the bad and the ugly from Sunday’s loss to the Saints - 104.3 The Fan
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Startup Spotlight: JumpButton Studio's work goes far beyond making games, apps and animations - Philadelphia Business Journal

stratupnation.blogspot.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Startup Spotlight: JumpButton Studio's work goes far beyond making games, apps and animations  Philadelphia Business Journal

"Startup" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 06:15PM
https://ift.tt/39prZVe

Startup Spotlight: JumpButton Studio's work goes far beyond making games, apps and animations - Philadelphia Business Journal
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

MoFo's Venture Capital Co-Chair Joins Drug Manufacturing Startup - Bloomberg Law

stratupnation.blogspot.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

MoFo's Venture Capital Co-Chair Joins Drug Manufacturing Startup  Bloomberg Law

"Startup" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 06:04PM
https://ift.tt/2Vor6DX

MoFo's Venture Capital Co-Chair Joins Drug Manufacturing Startup - Bloomberg Law
"Startup" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2MXTQ2S
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

The Rise and Fall—and Rise Again—of Chinese EV Startup NIO - The Wall Street Journal

The Good, Bad And Ugly From The Green Bay Packers' Win Over The Chicago Bears - Forbes

The Good, the Bad and the Difference in LA Rams ugly loss to the 49ers - Turf Show Times

stratupnation.blogspot.com

There are many words to describe the Rams’ 23-20 loss to the 49ers on Sunday and not all of them are bad.

Aaron Donald continues to play like the NFL’s premier defensive athlete; a legend who not only lives, he thrives with each breath and heartbeat. Jordan Fuller may qualify his interception — his third in seven days — as being in “the right place, right time” and nothing more. Funny how often the rookie has found himself in those situations and as author Simon Van Booy once wrote, “Coincidences mean you’re on the right path.”

And another first year player, Cam Akers, proved again — to anybody still ignorant enough to not understand football — that running backs matter.

Los Angeles has dropped to 7-4 and Jared Goff has not yet proven to be passable, so to speak, when the Rams are in a must-win situation against a quality defense. That is an issue and the “The Bad” section will cover that. But as quickly as the Rams found themselves in first place after defeating the Seahawks and Bucs in the last two games, so too could the NFL find LA back in the driver’s seat by season’s end.

The Good

Jordan Fuller interception

Fuller picked off Tom Brady twice last week and he grabs his third career interception here against Nick Mullens. He’s now made a name for himself on defense against one of the best quarterbacks he’ll face in 2020 and also against Brady.

Jeff Wilson fumbles it back to Rams

Sebastian Joseph-Day was to be displaced somewhat by A’Shawn Robinson, but he had seven tackles and this forced fumble on Sunday. I’m not sure the snap counts yet, but Robinson finished with one tackle. Morgan Fox had the recovery and later added a sack.

Aaron Donald forced fumble, Troy Hill recovery for touchdown cuts lead to 4

Aaron Donald sack

I want Aaron Donald to be considered for MVP. Even if the Rams did lose this game, who was the most valuable player on either team? Who was the most valuable player in the world on Sunday? It might have been Patrick Mahomes. It might have also been Donald.

Cam Akers has a 61-yard run and then a touchdown

Akers came into the week having posted a previous career-high of 61 yards for a single game total. He got all of that on a single carry against the 49ers, the longest run by a Rams player this season. Akers now has the two longest runs for the Rams this year and he’s the closest thing to an explosive weapon that they have outside of Robert Woods and Cooper Kupp.

Darrell Henderson gained only 19 yards on 10 carries. Akers finished with 84 and he’s scored twice in the last two games.

The Bad

Malcolm Brown fumble

Unfortunately, Brown had four yards on three carries and a fumble.

Deebo Samuel for 33 yards

This is one of many plays for Samuel, who returned to the field after sitting out the previous month. Samuel bullies players in a similar way to how George Kittle bullies players.

Raheem Mostert touchdown

Mostert has been out since a week before Samuel went out. He had 43 yards on 16 carries with one touchdown and a fumble.

Richard Sherman intercepts Jared Goff

“Right place, right time” is right for Richard Sherman, who had been out since Week 1. San Francisco was as healthy as they’ve been in weeks, and they still aren’t all that healthy, having played without Kittle, Brandon Aiyuk and Nick Bosa, among others.

Jared Goff fumbles near end of first half

More bad news for Goff to end the half. The odds of them getting at least a field goal here were high prior to this play.

Jared Goff throws pick-six to open second half

This is no worse than maybe a 10-point swing because of Goff and not protecting the football. In a matter of one minute of game play.

Can’t stop Deebo Samuel

Samuel had 11 catches and 133 yards.

Goff’s inaccuracy in fourth quarter gives 49ers the ball back in final two

Sean McVay’s end of game coaching

It’s hard to fathom how a coach can have both the high-highs and the low-lows of Sean McVay.

Jalen Ramsey offsides penalty makes for a shorter field goal attempt

Ramsey may be an elite cornerback but he was far from that adjective in attempting to block Robbie Gould’s game-winning field goal from 47 yards out. Gould missed from 50 earlier in the game but he got into a much more comfortable range when Ramsey jumped offsides for no good reason.

The Difference

This game featured a lot of action early and a lot of intensity late but was packed with a whole lot of little in the middle. The score was 7-3 at halftime and at one point the teams combined for 19 straight drives that didn’t end in an offensive touchdown. It’s easy (and fair) to point to how the Rams started and finished to find reasons for the loss, but perhaps the real culprit is the fact that McVay and Goff and the offensive line and everybody involved couldn’t come away with three more points during that destructively boring and mistake-addled middle.

Kyle Shanahan and Nick Mullens was the better head coach/quarterback combo this week and that’s why the 49ers are 5-6 and only two games behind LA with five games to play.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"bad" - Google News
November 30, 2020 at 10:03AM
https://ift.tt/3qex2hi

The Good, the Bad and the Difference in LA Rams ugly loss to the 49ers - Turf Show Times
"bad" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SpwJRn
https://ift.tt/2z7gkKJ

Search

Featured Post

Benjamina Ebuehi’s recipe for earl grey cardamom buns - The Guardian

stratupnation.blogspot.com W ho can resist a good cardamom bun? I’ll always choose cardamom over cinnamon – it just feels much brighter an...

Postingan Populer